<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brighton &#38; Hove&#039;s REGENCY Magazine &#187; The Old Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/tag/the-old-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk</link>
	<description>The Community Magazine For The Heart Of Our City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old Market Update</title>
		<link>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/02/old-market-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/02/old-market-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REGENCY</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Old Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers will recall the article we ran in the December issue of REGENCY about the Old Market. We can now report that the Old Market Trust has folded, and re-opened the same day as ...


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: Financial History'>The Old Market: Financial History</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/03/komedia-closure-threatened/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Komedia Closure Threatened'>Komedia Closure Threatened</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits'>The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular readers will recall the article we ran in the December issue of REGENCY about the Old Market. We can now report that the Old Market Trust has folded, and re-opened the same day as a private company. Regrettably this means that many performers have been left with unpaid bills. It seems they are not alone &#8211; the arts venue also owed the taxman £240,000. The rumour is that Barclay’s Bank have now sold the building to a ‘happy-clappy’ church. The good news (get it? ‘Good News’ and church? Oh never mind) is that it will probably still be used as a venue for events.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: Financial History'>The Old Market: Financial History</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/03/komedia-closure-threatened/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Komedia Closure Threatened'>Komedia Closure Threatened</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits'>The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/02/old-market-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Old Market: Financial History</title>
		<link>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REGENCY</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brighton and Hove City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Old Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After having their planning application for the Old Market rejected Trustees have launched a petition to request money from the local council. <strong>Tony Davenport</strong> discovers that things are not quite as they seem.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits'>The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/02/old-market-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Old Market Update'>Old Market Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/11/royal-alex-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Update'>Royal Alex Update</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/old-market-arts-centre.jpg" alt="The Old Market Arts Centre" title="The Old Market Arts Centre" width="565" height="243" class="alignright size-full wp-image-351" />Repeatedly over the last decade, The Old Market Arts Centre Trustees, unable or unwilling to service or repay a very large historic debt, have looked beyond its profitable trading position for rescue funding.</p>
<p>At the beginning of this year, in a change of tack, Trustees submitted the first of two planning application attempts which sought to build two large glass penthouses on top of the historic Grade II listed Old Market building in Hove. Approval of this plan would have set a dangerous precedent giving carte blanche to anyone to make unusual changes to listed structures just on the basis of ‘needing the money’. The first application was refused and in September the revised application was also refused. Tellingly, planning committee Member, Cllr Paul Steedman, stated that he was not convinced by the claimed financial need.</p>
<p>In the wake of these refusals, a petition seeking grant support from the council is now being introduced before every event by Old Market manager and trustee Stephen Neiman. He explains that the Old Market does not receive any funding from the council, nor from the Arts Council. He readily admits the Trust covers the cost of its operations, but says it is unable to clear its “historic debt”. An electronic petition (lodged on the council’s website) states that the requests for funding “<em>have been met continually by both organisations stating that although they are supportive of the arts and community use of the building, they cannot support a project with such a capital deficit.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Superficially it appears to be a reasonable request for some financial assistance &#8211; but is it all it seems? Prospective signatories are given the impression that neither the Arts Council nor the council have ever donated a penny. Even Delia Forester, ex-Labour councillor and ex-deputy chair of planning, takes as read this supposed lack of public funding in her letter of support for the two glass penthouses.</p>
<p>It is in fact an ungrateful slur on both organisations. In 1999 The National Lottery (through the Arts Council) donated £1 million to the Old Market Trust &#8211; at the time, the largest donation to an arts project in the South East. Furthermore the only significant condition was that there would be a clawback should the Old Market be sold within a 10 year timeframe. Those 10 years expired on 11th March 2009 &#8211; around the time the Old Market Trustees registered the planning application for the glass penthouses.</p>
<p>In 1998 the Labour administration provided the Old Market Trust with a loan of £275,000, to be repaid in 10 equal instalments. In 2001 that debt was deferred to 2006. Further funding   came in the form of a £585,000 grant from the  Single Regeneration Partnership, administered through Brighton &#038; Hove City Council.</p>
<p>The Labour-run administration, in which Delia Forester was a key player, went even further in 2004. Council finance officers Catherine Vaughan and Peter Sargent presented a report to councillors recommending that the loan should be converted to a grant. Their reasoning was that should the Old Market Trust become insolvent Brighton and Hove City Council would be unlikely to retrieve the £275,000, and as they had already distributed the money to the Trust it would “<em>have no additional financial impact on the council</em>”. The report concluded that “<em>The council therefore has no financial gain from pursuing repayment of the loan</em>”. Spurious logic, but the report was approved, and the unpaid debt wiped out.</p>
<p>These actions helped to significantly reduce the “historic debt” to just over £1 million. In 2007, local businessman, Jonathan Bigg, entered into an agreement with the Old Market Trust to take 250-year leases on areas within the Old Market building with the intention of sub-letting them as office space. For this he paid the Trust £1 million, a sum he maintains Stephen Neiman and the Trustees assured him would clear their debt. Having given the money, he then learned that the Trust intended to build two glass penthouses above the areas he had just leased. When he discovered that their motivation behind the glass penthouse plan was again to clear this debt, he was told that his £1 million had made no impact on the debt and that the Trust remained in exactly the same position as before. He asks &#8211; quite reasonably &#8211; “<em>where has the money gone?</em>”</p>
<p>With stories floating around about late payments to staff it seems at least one person is sitting pretty in all this and that is the Old Market’s artistic director, Ms. Caroline Brown. In 2005 Ms. Brown took home £32,500, and in the following year £35,000. In 2007, supposedly at a time of intense financial pressure due to the Old Market debts, her salary rose sharply to £60,535, coupled with expense claims of £17,500. In fact Ms. Brown’s salary makes up a large chunk of total outgoings on salaries. It is, perhaps, no coincidence that Ms. Caroline Brown is actually Mrs. Caroline Neiman, the wife of Old Market manager and trustee Stephen Neiman.</p>
<p>It seems a shame that the Old Market could close its doors soon &#8211; it is undoubtedly a superb and successful venue marred by the seemingly poor financial decisions of its trustees. We invite readers to form their own conclusions.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits'>The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/02/old-market-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Old Market Update'>Old Market Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/11/royal-alex-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Update'>Royal Alex Update</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Old Market: A Tangle of Conflicting Loyalties and Remits</title>
		<link>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REGENCY</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brighton and Hove City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delia Forrester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regency Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Brighton Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Old Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Valerie Paynter</strong> considers how the city’s conservation groups were undone by one planning application


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: Financial History'>The Old Market: Financial History</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/11/royal-alex-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Update'>Royal Alex Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/12/royal-alex-site-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Site Update'>Royal Alex Site Update</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/old-market-arts-centre.jpg" alt="The Old Market Arts Centre" title="The Old Market Arts Centre" width="565" height="243" class="alignright size-full wp-image-351" />Just after World War II the bulldozer and developers threat to Brunswick Square and Terrace architecture led to the formation of The Regency Society. Over the years it grew to be the premier Conservation voice in Brighton and Hove, the respectable Club to be seen to be joining &#038; the trusted repository of bequeathed collections, such as the James Gray photographic archive.<br />
Hierarchically, it has reigned over all the others. The Hove Civic Society and The Brighton Society each had their respected status, but even they have been subservient in terms of status to the very Grand and very respected Regency Society. The pecking order then takes in all the other groups like the Kemp Town Society, The Kingscliffe Society and the myriad local area resident &#038; amenity groups and overtly campaigning ones such as my own saveHOVE and the Marina area’s more recently formed Save Brighton.</p>
<p>But the Regency Society was the leader of the pack, attracting serious expertise to its ruling Committee. In recent years this has come to mean attracting expertise with unattractive agendas. Predatory developers, architects and politicians, looking to serve their own interests by standing for and being elected to positions on the ruling Committee, have increased the danger of a diluted or abandoned conservation remit.</p>
<p>How could the members of the Regency Society have allowed people like that to gain major positions of power on their Committee, neutralising the credibility of The Regency Society as a conservation voice! By next AGM it will just be an asset-rich club, protecting and advancing the careers of architects, politicians and developers.</p>
<p>For most Regency Society members (other groups work in a similar fashion), membership has been all about the tea and biscuits, the wine and chamber music in the Royal Pavilion at AGM, the garden party, the lectures, the coach trips and the £60 dinners. There is little interest or involvement with boring old planning.</p>
<p>For the committed conservationist, however, membership has been about protecting heritage, Grades 1 and 2 Listed buildings, the Regency era Brunswick Townscape (mostly listed buildings) and the cultural story of this nation along the thread of time. Architecture is certainly High Art to the Starchitects of our time and for me, these areas of listed buildings merit the term “Artscape”.<br />
“My turn! My turn!” the Horribles shrill, bug-eyed, teeth bared, fame and wealth on their minds. They want these buildings “euthanized” and see ambitions thwarted by their taking up space THEY could be using. “Get off the stage! My turn! My turn!” And the cultural markers that tell the visitor what country they are in, what town, city or village they are in are just so-much “brown field site” to them.</p>
<p>In recent years leading members of the various conservation-agenda groups have “intermarried” so to speak. They have propped up each other’s dwindling memberships by joining each other’s groups. They have aged and died. They have not been replaced with new members possessed of their deep respect, wish to learn and understandings of history and heritage, their educational strengths and grit in defending the riches of heritage this country so proudly shows off to the tourism trade. The dwindling numbers of them desperately prop up each other’s conservation remits and become haunted by the dilution and marginalisation of conservation. Social memberships and the brazen infiltration by predators for whom conservation is optional has bred deep despair. And a lot of empty hand-wringing.</p>
<p>At the time of the Old Market’s February planning application to put 2 glass box penthouses on the roof of the Grade 2 Listed Old Market, the convenor of the Regency Society’s planning group was former Labour councillor, Delia Forester, a woman who used her position on the planning committee on March 23rd, 2007 to provide fulsome support for the Frank Gehry colossus on Hove seafront. She led the majority Labour Party vote which gave it planning permission.</p>
<p>How did someone like that become convenor of the planning group at the Regency Society? A weak constitution helped allow it. The supine, tea &#038; biscuits credulous membership voted her (and others) onto the ruling committee and thence to the planning group, the credibility of the Regency Society being of no concern to them.<br />
How was it right that the Chair of the Regency Society was also an Old Market Trustee? How is it right that the Treasurer of the Regency Society, Stephen Neiman, is also the Old Market Trustee raising this glass boxes planning application? Should he not have resigned from the Regency Society to do that? Entanglements and loyalties so deep that you can barely see the join have meant that the move by the Old Market Trust to put big glass boxes on its Grade 2 Listed roof compromised the Regency Society’s conservation remit. Or did it?</p>
<p>Ahead of the 2009 Regency Society AGM, and using her Brighton University email account instead of Regency Society letterhead , Delia Forester, convenor of the Regency Society planning group, Labour politician &#038; architect, registered fulsome planning consultation support on behalf of the Regency Society. Nervous breakdowns, angst and hysteria ensued when this became known. Loyalty to Stephen Neiman, however, led to old stagers staying their hands and not objecting as they would otherwise have done and then getting in a state about it. Remit vs. Loyalty to a close &#038; valued colleague and mate.</p>
<p>Why did she (with others in commanding positions in The Regency Society) do all this? Why not start their own group? Why destroy the Regency Society’s remit and credibility? How was it even possible to do so? Putting on a military hat, I would say that taking out the leader is the best way to topple the rest. And so it came to pass.<br />
Over at the Hove Civic Society, conflicts of loyalty, angst, rage and shattered alliances tested their commitment to conservation to its limit. One of its two members on the Council’s Conservation Advisory Group resigned over this one application. The Hove Civic prevaricated, vascillated, hung back but finally moved to a position of objection &#8211; but with blood on the floor.</p>
<p>This story was repeated all over the shop.</p>
<p>At the Regency Society AGM, regime change led to the new Chairman withdrawing Forester’s Regency Society response to the Old Market application for the two glass penthouses, declaring to the Council that because the Society was divided, there would be no response. No response to an application affecting a listed Regency building in a massively listed Regency townscape. The infiltrators had done their job and taken out the conservation movement’s leader group.</p>
<p>Embarrassed and mortified, torn between hurting Old Market Trustee and applicant, Stephen Neiman, or hurting the listed building, the amenity groups were like chickens trapped in the coop with a fox. Only the 11th hour intervention of the London-based Georgian Group sobered everyone up.</p>
<p>The Old Market is saved from glass boxes for the moment. But now the time for reckoning has come. And it is clear that the Regency Society membership will not make the effort to defend the conservation remit by learning anything other than who will be playing what at the next AGM chamber concert. It is clear too that, unlike the Brighton Society, which allows anyone to be a member, but bars politicians, developers and architects from Committee membership, the Regency Society has failed to write a Constitution which protects itself from destruction of its remit &#038; respectable purpose.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-financial-history/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Old Market: Financial History'>The Old Market: Financial History</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/11/royal-alex-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Update'>Royal Alex Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2010/12/royal-alex-site-update/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Royal Alex Site Update'>Royal Alex Site Update</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regencymagazine.co.uk/2009/12/the-old-market-a-tangle-of-conflicting-loyalties-and-remits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

